Hakim v. Regents of the University of Michigan
Summary
What this Case is About
ADC filed a federal lawsuit against the University of Michigan on behalf of eight terminated workers—one full-time employee and seven student employees. The plaintiffs were fired and permanently barred from future University employment after participating in pro-Palestine protests calling on the University to divest from Israel, including a peaceful on-campus sit-in and a demonstration on public sidewalks urging the Board of Regents to meet with students. The lawsuit names the Regents of the University of Michigan along with several individual administrators, including President Santa Ono, as defendants.
The complaint alleges that the terminations and lifetime employment bans violate the plaintiffs’ First Amendment right to free speech and their Fourteenth Amendment right to due process. It argues these actions represent a continuation of the University’s broader pattern of retaliating against pro-Palestine advocacy on its Ann Arbor campus, and asks the court to reverse the terminations and blacklisting.
Case Files
Documents, press & coverage
Court documents
Filings in chronological order · named date, full name of filing.
Press Releases
ADC statements on the case, most recent first.
Your gift sustains the studies, the case files, and the classroom resources that keep this work credible.